Friday, May 19, 2023

Is the Big Bang Theory to be Believed as Truth?

Do you watch the Big Bang Theory? It's that comedy TV show about a bunch of nerdy scientists who live together and attend the same educational institution. I am not a regular viewer but if I happen to be up at night and I am flipping channels and land on the channel at the right time, I'll watch it. I like the guy named Sheldon. He's from Texas. That means he's not only smart about science but he knows all about football. Because in Texas football is a religion. LOL.

Anyway! Connecting the dots, I read an interesting article by a fellow writer about the Big Bang . Sharing the link below. In addition, I left comments at the article which I am re-sharing in this blog post.

Why The Big Bang is one of the most widely Accepted Scientific Theories of our time | Read.Cash




The Big Bang is the most accepted scientific “theory” because there are that many people in the world who choose not to believe the scientific “facts” clearly set forth in Genesis account of The Creation, the origin of the universe.

The other fact is that there would be many unemployed scientists if they did not say they were working on trying to substantiate the theory. The Big Bang Theory was introduced in 1927. Ironically, it was supposed to provide proof that the biblical account was correct, i.e. religion and science need not contradict each other. Only people started asking more questions and debating it. NASA has people employed whose “job” is to study The Big Bang. Of course, NASA is not the organization in the world with scientists and researchers working on this. Big Bang news and updates are published regularly in publications like Science Daily.

You either believe one or the other. Either the universe was the result of an explosion that created order out of chaos OR it was the result of the orderly thinking of a Supreme Intelligent Being. Supreme meaning that Being is wasy smarter than all of us! You can't believe both! As “a theist”, I believe the latter.

Also, I disagree that it is more important to identify the “bad science”. Anybody can come up with pseudo-science. You don't even have to be a scientist to come up with a bad scientific theory about anything! The search for truth is far more important and a much more worthwhile endeavor. Besides how can you possibly identify the bad science WHEN you don't know what the good science is in the first place?

"... keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called ..." (1 Tim 6: 20)


RELATED LINKS:






No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

***

Most Popular Posts of All Time